These plug-ins can fall into a wide range of categories, such as:
#HELICON FOCUS BACK TO LIGHTROOM DNG SOFTWARE#
This includes everything from Adobe’s own Photoshop to a software solution made by any other vendor. In the context of this article, I consider any software tool that can integrate with LrC that offers access to specialized image editing solutions that may do a better job (subjectively to you) than what LrC can do itself, or that LrC cannot do at all, to fall under the large umbrella of being a plug-in. We are the only ones who can answer those questions for ourselves, and that can require time and experimentation. That said, depending on your current photographic style, subject matter, output needs, and visual aesthetic there may be third-party software tools (i.e., plug-ins) that you do find very helpful for your workflow even if it is not the right choice for someone else.Īs you consider adding in any other tool to your workflow you must consider the downsides of doing so, such as additional cost, additional learning curve, and potentially additional time required to complete the task (some can be quite resource intensive), against the upsides, such as this tool may just do a better job (image quality-wise or maybe it is easier/automatic), it may save you more time in the long run, it may open up new photographic opportunities, or it may solve other problems with your current workflow. Heck, even over the course of one’s own photographic journey you have undoubtedly found that your own taste, needs, and eye continually evolve. There is no one best workflow for all photographers. In all my years of helping other photographers with their workflows I have found that there are a wide variety of workflows, a wide range of subjective tastes, and a wide range of needs. The two images LOOK the same (with the second one being inaccurate) until I view it 1:1, after which as far as I know, it stays showing the correct image - I exited from Lightroom, started it with a different catalog, then restarted it with the original catalog and the second image still displayed correctly.īTW: I've even completely deleted all the files in cache between runs just to see if it was something odd there, but that didn't appear to make any difference.A question just about every Lightroom Classic (LrC) user faces at some point is, should I be using such-and-such plug-in to do X, Y, or Z in my workflow? The answer, of course, is it depends.Įach issue of Photoshop User Magazine (and previous issues of Lightroom Magazine) contains reviews and in-depth articles about using different plug-ins, and so I’m not here to repeat those efforts (I do recommend you look back at previous issues if interested in a specific plug-in review), but rather to consider the question of where and when a plug-in might fit in a typical LrC workflow, and how you might decide if it is right for you.įirst, to answer the question of do you even need to use a plug-in of any sort, I would say, no, you don’t need to at all. I'm guessing it's SOMETHING I have set goofy in the preferences that's causing this, but I have no idea what. The two images have DIFFERENT names, were created in sequence so they're from different times, and they' DIFFERENT SIZES. If I take the 20-image output and view it 1:1, it does the normal "loading" then CHANGES to the output I'm expecting to see with both the front AND back flowers sharp.
Flowers in front are sharp, but flowers in back SHOULD BE SHARP.
Looks EXACTLY the same as the previous 10-image stack. Take the SAME SERIES, but this time export all TWENTY images, do exactly the same rendering in HF, save the output dng with a unique name and return to Lightroom. Flowers in front are sharp, flowers in back are not. Take the first 10 IMAGES, export them to Helicon Focus using 'dng' as the image format, do the rendering in HF, save the output dng with a unique name, and return to Lightroom. Nikon D850 shooting a 20-image focus stack. I did screen captures so you'll see what I see.
#HELICON FOCUS BACK TO LIGHTROOM DNG HOW TO#
I"m not sure how to title this, but here's what's happening.
0 kommentar(er)
